Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Barefoot in the Snow

Today the first flurries of snow actually stick to the ground, and give that ‘powdered sugar’ effect which will be so boring in a few weeks, but is still nice at the moment. Today I indulged myself in my annual ritual of going barefoot in the snow, just once, just to prove I still can. Today I told the girls to make sure their snow boots still fit, because if we wait until the first big snow storm the stores will all be sold out (ridiculous, but no stores around here ever re-order snow boots, no matter how the winter turns out).

Today is not too early or too late for this kind of snow, pretty typical, actually, but it reminded me that I hadn’t posted anything about climate change yet.

This is a particularly good time for it, because at this very moment, in Bali, the UN is holding a major Climate Change Conference. Not surprisingly, there has been concern about the carbon emmissions generated in getting scientists from all over the world to travel to Bali. Also not suprisingly, there is apparently a virtual conference going on in Second Life, so those who would rather not (or can’t afford to) go physically can participate as well.

The conference started two days ago, and already the first major alarming story has come out of it. Apparently the tropics are expanding much faster than models have predicted they would. A free subscription is required to read the article online, but here’s the abstract:

Nature Geoscience
Published online: 2 December 2007 | doi:10.1038/ngeo.2007.38

“Widening of the tropical belt in a changing climate”

Dian J. Seidel1, Qiang Fu, William J. Randel & Thomas J. Reichler

Some of the earliest unequivocal signs of climate change have been the warming of the air and ocean, thawing of land and melting of ice in the Arctic. But recent studies are showing that the tropics are also changing. Several lines of evidence show that over the past few decades the tropical belt has expanded. This expansion has potentially important implications for subtropical societies and may lead to profound changes in the global climate system. Most importantly, poleward movement of large-scale atmospheric circulation systems, such as jet streams and storm tracks, could result in shifts in precipitation patterns affecting natural ecosystems, agriculture, and water resources. The implications of the expansion for stratospheric circulation and the distribution of ozone in the atmosphere are as yet poorly understood. The observed recent rate of expansion is greater than climate model projections of expansion over the twenty-first century, which suggests that there is still much to be learned about this aspect of global climate change.

Timed to coincide with the beginning of the conference, activists from the Rising Tide Movement put up a false press release, claiming that the USCAP (US Climate Action Partnership) a consortium of a number of major businesses, had committed to a 90% reduction in greenhouse gas emission by 2050. I’m not so sure what they hoped to achieve by this. The USCAP caught it very quickly and set out their own press release to clarify the situtation.

Another hoax of interest, last month a pseudonymous writer perpetrated an elaborate hoax on climage change deniers, by creating a faux publication and seeing who would take the bait.

Not a hoax, but probably a good candidate for the Ig-Nobel, a paper soon to be published Who pays for the ‘beer fridge’? Evidence from Canada by Denise Young of the Department of Economics, University of Alberta, assigns a disproportionate amount of Canada’s greenhouse emissions to beer drinkers who often keep the old inefficient refrigerator around after buying a new one.

In other words, let’s Blame Canada.

alt : http://www.youtube.com/v/wOzG7bBylRo&rel=1

Posted by Lise Mendel at 15:04:35 | Permalink | Comments (3)

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Public Service Announcement

I’m posting this declaration of how I’ll handle comments here, and edit this post as things change. Discussion of the reasons I have a policy follow *.

Comment Policy

  • Try to be polite, even when you are replying to a comment or post you disagree with. The aim is to have a friendly conversation and exchange of ideas, not a series of arguements.
  • The form allows for a link to your web page. I don’t expect to be checking those links at all (but it’s always possible that experience will change my mind). If you must advertise a web page unrelated to the post the appropriate way to do it would be to use that field to link it.
  • Lengthy advertisements will be deleted or disemvoweled.
  • Flames and personal attacks will be deleted or disemvoweled.
  • I will reply to many comments using the ‘respond to’ link, but some may become the seeds for future posts.

Science for Your Amusement

Earliest chocolate drinks were alcoholic (but they already knew that), and 500 years earlier than previously thought. Archaelology Online and Dogfish Head Brewery may try to ‘reconstruct the brew. They previously did the same thing with Chateau Jiahu, which just might (probably not) be still available

Here’s the abstract to the article “Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap dancers: economic evidence for human estrus?” from “Evolution and Human Behavior”. A silly study, but it does have something to say about the concept of concealed ovulation.

Finally, the US Government is suggesting that, in case of a deadly influenza pandemic, Homeland Security gets preferential treatment - as though they’d be ‘on the front lines’ in response to the pandemic? Doesn’t make sense to me.

* Blog.com allows only two ways for a blog owner to handle comments. Either allow them all, or approve (possibly edit) them. There is no ‘bot test screen option. I switched to the ‘approve’ method after someone made a one line comment with a four line advertisement at the end (if I’d been a regular Boing-Boing reader I would have disemboweled the ad, as it is, I deleted it). I have to ‘approve’ of every comment before it gets posted, so I’m going to take some level of responsibility for every comment.

I understand that certain, potentially interesting, conversations can’t happen if I choose to actively moderate. I also understand that there are certain, potentially interesting, conversations which can’t happen in a ‘blog culture where every conversation must be a confrontation. The internet is a big place, and there’s plenty of room for all styles of convesation. If you have trouble finding a science blog with a sufficiently ‘lively’ environment to fit your own style, ask and I’ll post a list.

Posted by Lise Mendel at 15:28:40 | Permalink | Comments (2)